Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37243510›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2023

Improved prime editing allows for routine predictable gene editing in Physcomitrium patens.

Pierre-François Perroud, Anouchka Guyon-Debast, Josep M Casacuberta, Wyatt Paul, Jean-Philippe Pichon, David Comeau, Fabien Nogué

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The Importance of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Isolation and Transfection of Nicotiana benthamiana Mesophyll Protoplasts.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pierre-François PerroudUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin (IJPB), 78000 Versailles, France.
Anouchka Guyon-DebastUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin (IJPB), 78000 Versailles, France.
Josep M CasacubertaCentre for Research in Agricultural Genomics CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus UAB, Edifici CRAG, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.
Wyatt PaulLimagrain Europe, Centre de Recherche de Chappes, 63720 Chappes, France.
Jean-Philippe PichonLimagrain Europe, Centre de Recherche de Chappes, 63720 Chappes, France.
David ComeauLimagrain Europe, Centre de Recherche de Chappes, 63720 Chappes, France.
Fabien NoguéUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin (IJPB), 78000 Versailles, France.
AgroParisTech · FRLimagrain (France) · FRCenter for Research in Agricultural Genomics · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient and precise gene editing is the gold standard of any reverse genetic study. The recently developed prime editing approach, a modified CRISPR/Cas9 [clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein] editing method, has reached the precision goal but its editing rate can be improved. We present an improved methodology that allows for routine prime editing in the model plant Physcomitrium patens, whilst exploring potential new prime editing improvements. Using a standardized protoplast transfection procedure, multiple prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA) structural and prime editor variants were evaluated targeting the APT reporter gene through direct plant selection. Together, enhancements of expression of the prime editor, modifications of the 3' extension of the pegRNA, and the addition of synonymous mutation in the reverse transcriptase template sequence of the pegRNA dramatically improve the editing rate without affecting the quality of the edits. Furthermore, we show that prime editing is amenable to edit a gene of interest through indirect selection, as demonstrated by the generation of a Ppdek10 mutant. Additionally, we determine that a plant retrotransposon reverse transcriptase enables prime editing. Finally, we show for the first time the possibility of performing prime editing with two independently coded peptides.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingRNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseRNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseEpegRNAgenome editingPhyscomitrium patensprime editingpseudoknotsplit prime editing

Identifiers

PMID37243510
PMCPMC10575697
OpenAlexW4378533386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.