Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37243058›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

Challenges in Assessing COVID-19 Vaccines Safety Signals-The Case of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine and Corneal Graft Rejection.

Christelle Bizimungu, Martine Sabbe, Françoise Wuillaume, Jamila Hamdani, Philippe Koch, Jean-Michel Dogné

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. COVID-19 vaccination and corneal allograft rejection- a review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christelle BizimunguDG Post Authorisation-Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, 1210 Brussels, Belgium.
Martine SabbeDG Post Authorisation-Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, 1210 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2824-1087
Françoise WuillaumeDG Post Authorisation-Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, 1210 Brussels, Belgium.
Jamila HamdaniDG Post Authorisation-Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, 1210 Brussels, Belgium.
Philippe KochDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hôpitaux Iris Sud-Site Ixelles, Réseau Chorus, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Michel DognéDG Post Authorisation-Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, 1210 Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid and large-scale roll-out of new COVID-19 vaccines has led to unprecedented challenges in assessing vaccine safety. In 2021, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) processed about 1.7 million safety reports related to COVID-19 vaccines in the EudraVigilance (EV) database and identified more than 900 potential signals. Beyond the large amount of information to be processed, the evaluation of safety signals has faced several difficulties and limitations, both in the assessment of case reports and in the investigation of databases. The evaluation of a signal of corneal graft rejection (CGR) with Vaxzevria

Indexed as

adverse eventcausalitycorneal graft rejectionCOVID-19pharmacovigilancesafetyvaccines

Identifiers

PMID37243058
PMCPMC10221427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.