Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37242864›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

Thermo-Mechanical Recyclability of Additively Manufactured Polypropylene and Polylactic Acid Parts and Polypropylene Support Structures.

Niko Nagengast, Christian Bay, Frank Döpper, Hans-Werner Schmidt, Christian Neuber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Niko NagengastChair of Biomechanics, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bayreuth, Universitaetsstrasse 9, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany.
Christian BayResearch Center for Additive Innovations, University of Bayreuth, Universitaetsstrasse 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9438-9381
Frank DöpperResearch Center for Additive Innovations, University of Bayreuth, Universitaetsstrasse 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany.
Hans-Werner SchmidtChair of Macromolecular Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Science, University of Bayreuth, Universitaetsstrasse 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1761-1153
Christian NeuberChair of Macromolecular Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Science, University of Bayreuth, Universitaetsstrasse 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8064-6463
University of Bayreuth · DEBavarian Polymer Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymers have a reputation for several advantageous characteristics like chemical resistance, weight reduction, and simple form-giving processes. The rise of additive manufacturing technologies such as Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) has introduced an even more versatile production process that supported new product design and material concepts. This led to new investigations and innovations driven by the individualization of customized products. The other side of the coin contains an increasing resource and energy consumption satisfying the growing demand for polymer products. This turns into a magnitude of waste accumulation and increased resource consumption. Therefore, appropriate product and material design, taking into account end-of-life scenarios, is essential to limit or even close the loop of economically driven product systems. In this paper, a comparison of virgin and recycled biodegradable (polylactic acid (PLA)) and petroleum-based (polypropylene (PP) & support) filaments for extrusion-based Additive Manufacturing is presented. For the first time, the thermo-mechanical recycling setup contained a service-life simulation, shredding, and extrusion. Specimens and complex geometries with support materials were manufactured with both, virgin and recycled materials. An empirical assessment was executed through mechanical (ISO 527), rheological (ISO 1133), morphological, and dimensional testing. Furthermore, the surface properties of the PLA and PP printed parts were analyzed. In summary, PP parts and parts from its support structure showed, in consideration of all parameters, suitable recyclability with a marginal parameter variance in comparison to the virgin material. The PLA components showed an acceptable decline in the mechanical values but through thermo-mechanical degradation processes, rheological and dimensional properties of the filament dropped decently. This results in significantly identifiable artifacts of the product optics, based on an increase in surface roughness.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingextrusion-based 3D printingFused Filament Fabrication (FFF)polymer characterizationthermo-mechanical recycling

Identifiers

PMID37242864
PMCPMC10223719
OpenAlexW4376274632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.