ArticlePolymers2023
Behavior Characteristics and Thermal Energy Absorption Mechanism of Physical Blowing Agents in Polyurethane Foaming Process.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Shape Memory Polymer Foam Based on Nanofibrillar Composites of Polylactide/Polyamide.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polyurethane rigid foam is a widely used insulation material, and the behavior characteristics and heat absorption performance of the blowing agent used in the foaming process are key factors that affect the molding performance of this material. In this work, the behavior characteristics and heat absorption of the polyurethane physical blowing agent in the foaming process were studied; this is something which has not been comprehensively studied before. This study investigated the behavior characteristics of polyurethane physical blowing agents in the same formulation system, including the efficiency, dissolution, and loss rates of the physical blowing agents during the polyurethane foaming process. The research findings indicate that both the physical blowing agent mass efficiency rate and mass dissolution rate are influenced by the vaporization and condensation process of physical blowing agent. For the same type of physical blowing agent, the amount of heat absorbed per unit mass decreases gradually as the quantity of physical blowing agent increases. The relationship between the two shows a pattern of initial rapid decrease followed by a slower decrease. Under the same physical blowing agent content, the higher the heat absorbed per unit mass of physical blowing agent, the lower the internal temperature of the foam when the foam stops expanding. The heat absorbed per unit mass of the physical blowing agents is a key factor affecting the internal temperature of the foam when it stops expanding. From the perspective of heat control of the polyurethane reaction system, the effects of physical blowing agents on the foam quality were ranked in order from good to poor as follows: HFC-245fa, HFC-365mfc, HFCO-1233zd(E), HFO-1336mzzZ, and HCFC-141b.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.