ArticlePharmaceutics2023
An Automated Customizable Live Web Crawler for Curation of Comparative Pharmacokinetic Data: An Intelligent Compilation of Research-Based Comprehensive Article Repository.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based unified models for predicting drug clearance from pharmacokinetic animal and study design variables.PloS one · 2026Article
- AutoPK: Leveraging LLMs and a Hybrid Similarity Metric for Advanced Retrieval of Pharmacokinetic Data from Complex Tables and Documents.International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence : [proceedings]. International Conference on Tools for Artificial Intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data curation has significant research implications irrespective of application areas. As most curated studies rely on databases for data extraction, the availability of data resources is extremely important. Taking a perspective from pharmacology, extracted data contribute to improved drug treatment outcomes and well-being but with some challenges. Considering available pharmacology literature, it is necessary to review articles and other scientific documents carefully. A typical method of accessing articles on journal websites is through long-established searches. In addition to being labor-intensive, this conventional approach often leads to incomplete-content downloads. This paper presents a new methodology with user-friendly models to accept search keywords according to the investigators' research fields for metadata and full-text articles. To accomplish this, scientifically published records on the pharmacokinetics of drugs were extracted from several sources using our navigating tool called the Web Crawler for Pharmacokinetics (WCPK). The results of metadata extraction provided 74,867 publications for four drug classes. Full-text extractions performed with WCPK revealed that the system is highly competent, extracting over 97% of records. This model helps establish keyword-based article repositories, contributing to comprehensive databases for article curation projects. This paper also explains the procedures adopted to build the proposed customizable-live WCPK, from system design and development to deployment phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.