ReviewPharmaceutics2023
Homology-Directed-Repair-Based Genome Editing in HSPCs for the Treatment of Inborn Errors of Immunity and Blood Disorders.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling and correction of SCID-X1 using CRISPR-Cas9 homology-directed repair in human HSPCs.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Review
- High-efficiency homology-directed insertion into the genome using the engineered homing endonuclease ARCUS.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Off-target effects in CRISPR-Cas genome editing for human therapeutics: Progress and challenges.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Review
- Precise measurement of CRISPR genome editing outcomes through single-cell DNA sequencing.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- Donor insertion into CX3CR1 allows epigenetic modulation of a constitutive promoter on hematopoietic stem cells and its activation upon myeloid differentiation.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Therapeutic gene correction of HBB frameshift CD41-42 (-TCTT) deletion in human hematopoietic stem cells.Advanced biotechnology · 2025Article
- DNA-PK inhibition enhances gene editing efficiency in HSPCs for CRISPR-based treatment of X-linked hyper IgM syndrome.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024Article
- Quantifying allele-specific CRISPR editing activity with CRISPECTOR2.0.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- TALEN-mediated intron editing of HSPCs enables transgene expression restricted to the myeloid lineage.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024Article
- Progress and harmonization of gene editing to treat human diseases: Proceeding of COST Action CA21113 GenE-HumDi.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Genome engineering via targeted nucleases, specifically CRISPR-Cas9, has revolutionized the field of gene therapy research, providing a potential treatment for diseases of the blood and immune system. While numerous genome editing techniques have been used, CRISPR-Cas9 homology-directed repair (HDR)-mediated editing represents a promising method for the site-specific insertion of large transgenes for gene knock-in or gene correction. Alternative methods, such as lentiviral/gammaretroviral gene addition, gene knock-out via non-homologous end joining (NHEJ)-mediated editing, and base or prime editing, have shown great promise for clinical applications, yet all possess significant drawbacks when applied in the treatment of patients suffering from inborn errors of immunity or blood system disorders. This review aims to highlight the transformational benefits of HDR-mediated gene therapy and possible solutions for the existing problems holding the methodology back. Together, we aim to help bring HDR-based gene therapy in CD34
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.