ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Pharmacokinetic Study and Metabolite Identification of CAM106 in Rats by Validated UHPLC-MS/MS.
Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given the limitations of existing antiviral drugs and vaccines, there is still an urgent need for new anti-influenza drugs. CAM106, a rupestonic acid derivative, was studied for its potent antiviral activity and showed a favorable inhibitory effect on influenza virus replication. However, many gaps exist in preclinical studies of CAM106. This study focused on the pharmacokinetic profile and metabolites of CAM106 in vivo. An efficient and fast bioanalytical method was successfully developed and validated for the quantitation of CAM106 in rat plasma. A mobile phase aqueous solution (A, containing 0.1% formic acid) and acetonitrile (B) worked within 0-3.5 min, with 60% B. The mass spectrum scanning mode was the parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) with a resolution of 17,500. The linear range of the method was 2.13-1063.83 ng/mL. The validated method was applied to a pharmacokinetic study in rats. The matrix effects ranged from 93.99% to 100.08% and the recovery ranged from 86.72% to 92.87%. The intra- and inter-day precisions were less than 10.24% and the relative error (RE) ranged from -8.92% to 7.1%. The oral bioavailability of CAM106 was 1.6%. Thereafter, its metabolites in rats were characterized using high-resolution mass spectrometry. The isomers M7-A, M7-B, M7-C, and M7-D were well separated. As a result, a total of 11 metabolites were identified in the feces, urine, and plasma of rats. The main metabolic pathways of CAM106 were oxidation, reduction, desaturation, and methylation. The assay was reliable and provided useful information for further clinical studies of CAM106.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.