Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37242494›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) and Neuroprotection, What Is New? An Up-To-Date Systematic Review.

Nurliana Abd Mutalib, Sharifah Aminah Syed Mohamad, Nor Atiqah Jusril, Nur Intan Hasbullah, Mohd Cairul Iqbal Mohd Amin, Nor Hadiani Ismail

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The effects ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. ProbioticsFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Application and Challenges of Using ProbioticDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nurliana Abd MutalibAtta-ur-Rahman Institute for Natural Product Discovery, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Puncak Alam 42300, Selangor, Malaysia.
Sharifah Aminah Syed MohamadAtta-ur-Rahman Institute for Natural Product Discovery, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Puncak Alam 42300, Selangor, Malaysia.
Nor Atiqah JusrilFaculty Bioresources and Food Industry, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Besut Campus, Besut 22200, Terengganu, Malaysia.
Nur Intan HasbullahAtta-ur-Rahman Institute for Natural Product Discovery, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Puncak Alam 42300, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mohd Cairul Iqbal Mohd AminCentre for Drug Delivery Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Selangor, Malaysia.
Nor Hadiani IsmailAtta-ur-Rahman Institute for Natural Product Discovery, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Puncak Alam 42300, Selangor, Malaysia.
Universiti Teknologi MARA · MYMalaysia Theological Seminary · MYNational University of Malaysia · MYSultan Zainal Abidin University · MY

Funding

Universiti Teknologi MARA 600-RMC/GPK 5/3 (016/2020)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, the potential role of probiotics has become prominent in the discoveries of neurotherapy against neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) exhibit neuroprotective properties and exert their effects via various mechanisms of actions. This review aimed to evaluate the effects of LAB on neuroprotection reported in the literature.

methodsA database search on Google Scholar, PubMed, and Science Direct revealed a total of 467 references, of which 25 were included in this review based on inclusion criteria which comprises 7 in vitro, 16 in vivo, and 2 clinical studies.

resultsFrom the studies, LAB treatment alone or in probiotics formulations demonstrated significant neuroprotective activities. In animals and humans, LAB probiotics supplementation has improved memory and cognitive performance mainly via antioxidant and anti-inflammatory pathways.

conclusionsDespite promising findings, due to limited studies available in the literature, further studies still need to be explored regarding synergistic effects, efficacy, and optimum dosage of LAB oral bacteriotherapy as treatment or prevention against neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’sLABlactic acid bacterianeurodegenerative diseasesneuroprotectionParkinson’sprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID37242494
PMCPMC10221206
OpenAlexW4375862904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.