Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37242483›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Sustainable Approach of Functional Biomaterials-Tissue Engineering for Skin Burn Treatment: A Comprehensive Review.

Loai A Elfawy, Chiew Yong Ng, Ibrahim N Amirrah, Zawani Mazlan, Adzim Poh Yuen Wen, Nur Izzah Md Fadilah, Manira Maarof, Yogeswaran Lokanathan, Mh Busra Fauzi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. GinExtraMed: Focus onPharmaceutics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Biocompatible Pickering Emulsions fromBiomaterials research · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Effects ofAdvanced biomedical research · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. RadixJournal of inflammation research · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Loai A ElfawyCentre for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0001-8074-1321
Chiew Yong NgCentre for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-5365-6471
Ibrahim N AmirrahCentre for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-4256-0626
Zawani MazlanCentre for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-9166-3437
Adzim Poh Yuen WenCentre for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-0903-6152
Nur Izzah Md FadilahCentre for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-8991-1828
Manira MaarofCentre for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-2154-7852
Yogeswaran LokanathanCentre for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-9548-6490
Mh Busra FauziCentre for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-6449-639X
University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre · MY

Funding

Geran Fundamental Fakulti Perubatan FF2022-331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burns are a widespread global public health traumatic injury affecting many people worldwide. Non-fatal burn injuries are a leading cause of morbidity, resulting in prolonged hospitalization, disfigurement, and disability, often with resulting stigma and rejection. The treatment of burns is aimed at controlling pain, removing dead tissue, preventing infection, reducing scarring risk, and tissue regeneration. Traditional burn wound treatment methods include the use of synthetic materials such as petroleum-based ointments and plastic films. However, these materials can be associated with negative environmental impacts and may not be biocompatible with the human body. Tissue engineering has emerged as a promising approach to treating burns, and sustainable biomaterials have been developed as an alternative treatment option. Green biomaterials such as collagen, cellulose, chitosan, and others are biocompatible, biodegradable, environment-friendly, and cost-effective, which reduces the environmental impact of their production and disposal. They are effective in promoting wound healing and reducing the risk of infection and have other benefits such as reducing inflammation and promoting angiogenesis. This comprehensive review focuses on the use of multifunctional green biomaterials that have the potential to revolutionize the way we treat skin burns, promoting faster and more efficient healing while minimizing scarring and tissue damage.

Indexed as

cellulosechitosancollagenmultifunctional bioscaffoldsquercetinskin burnsustainable biomaterialstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID37242483
PMCPMC10223453
OpenAlexW4375866196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.