Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37242384›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Does Experimental Reduction of Blacklegged Tick (

Richard S Ostfeld, Felicia Keesing

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Why are the ticks winning, and what can we do about it?Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dynamic nesting ofEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard S OstfeldCary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3707-9301
Felicia KeesingDepartment of Biology, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8561-695X
Bard College · USCary Institute of Ecosystem Studies · US

Funding

Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlling the abundance of blacklegged ticks is considered the foundation for the prevention of human exposure to pathogens transmitted by these vectors in eastern North America. The use of broadcast or host-targeted acaricides is generally found to be effective at reducing the local abundance of ticks. However, studies that incorporate randomization, placebo controls, and masking, i.e., "blinding", generally find lower efficacy. The few studies that include measurements of human-tick encounters and cases of tickborne disease have not shown impacts of acaricidal treatments. We compile literature on relevant studies from northeastern North America to address possible causes for discrepancies in study outcomes and suggest possible mechanisms that could underlie the diminished efficacy of tick control in reducing cases of tickborne disease in people.

Indexed as

acaricideinsecticidetick controltick managementvector controlvector management

Identifiers

PMID37242384
PMCPMC10221945
OpenAlexW4378515149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.