Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37242286›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2023

Isoflavone Consumption and Risk of Breast Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Jining Yang, Hui Shen, Mantian Mi, Yu Qin

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Tempeh Extract and HSC-3 Cell Migration: An In Vitro Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Phytochemicals in Cancer Chemoprevention: Preclinical and Clinical Studies.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jining YangResearch Center for Nutrition and Food Safety, Institute of Military Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China.
Hui ShenResearch Center for Nutrition and Food Safety, Institute of Military Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China.
Mantian MiChongqing Medical Nutrition Research Center, Chongqing 400038, China.
Yu QinResearch Center for Nutrition and Food Safety, Institute of Military Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2519-5820
Army Medical University · CN

Funding

CNS (China Nutrition Society) Research Fund for DRIs. not have
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleEpidemiological studies that focus on the relationship between dietary isoflavone intake and the risk of breast cancer still lead to inconsistent conclusions. Herein, we conducted a meta-analysis of the latest studies to explore this issue.

methodWe performed a systematic search using Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase from inception to August 2021. The robust error meta-regression (REMR) model and generalized least squares trend (GLST) model were used to establish dose-response relationships between isoflavones and breast cancer risk.

resultsSeven cohort studies and 17 case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis, and the summary OR for breast cancer was 0.71 (95% CI 0.72-0.81) when comparing the highest to the lowest isoflavone intake. A subgroup analysis further showed that neither menopausal status nor ER status has a significant influence on the association between isoflavone intake and breast cancer risk, while the isoflavone intake doses and study design does. When the isoflavones exposure was less than 10 mg/day, no effects on breast cancer risk were detected. The inverse association was significant in the case-control studies but not in the cohort studies. In the dose-response meta-analysis of the cohort studies, we observed an inverse association between isoflavone intake and breast cancer: a 10 mg/day increase in isoflavone intake was related to reductions of 6.8% (OR = 0.932, 95% CI 0.90-0.96) and 3.2% (OR = 0.968, 95% CI 0.94-0.99) in breast cancer risk when using REMR and GLST, respectively. In the dose-response meta-analysis of the case-control studies, the inverse association for every 10 mg/day isoflavone intake was associated with breast cancer risk reductions by 11.7%.

conclusionpresent evidence demonstrated that taking in dietary isoflavone is helpful in reducing the breast cancer risk.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsIsoflavonesCohort StudiesDietFemaleHumansObservational Studies as TopicRiskRisk FactorsIsoflavonesbreast cancerdose–responseisoflavonemeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID37242286
PMCPMC10224089
OpenAlexW4377242097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.