Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37242129›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2023

Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal.

Adoracion Nieto, Dan M Livovsky, Fernando Azpiroz

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04938934 nacompletednot on this map

Factors That Determine the Responses to Meal Ingestion: Conditioning Effect of Previous Symptoms

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteRan2021 to 2021Enrolled12ConditionsHealthyArmsLipids infusion, Sham infusion
NCT05897411 nacompletednot on this map

Factors That Determine the Responses to Meal Ingestion: Deconditioning of Acquired Food Aversion

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteRan2023 to 2023Enrolled12ConditionsHealthyArmsUnmasking previous conditioning procedure, No unmasking of previous conditioning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Adoracion NietoDigestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Dan M LivovskyDigestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8212-9638
Fernando AzpirozDigestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7327-960X
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain PID2021-122295OB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeal ingestion induces a postprandial experience that involves homeostatic and hedonic sensations. Our aim was to determine the effect of aversive conditioning on the postprandial reward of a comfort meal.

methodsA sham-controlled, randomised, parallel, single-blind study was performed on 12 healthy women (6 per group). A comfort meal was tested before and after coupling the meal with an aversive sensation (conditioning intervention), induced by infusion of lipids via a thin naso-duodenal catheter; in the pre- and post-conditioning tests and in the control group, a sham infusion was performed. Participants were instructed that two recipes of a tasty humus would be tested; however, the same meal was administered with a colour additive in the conditioning and post-conditioning tests. Digestive well-being (primary outcome) was measured every 10 min before and 60 min after ingestion using graded scales.

resultsIn the aversive conditioning group, the comfort meal in the pre-conditioning test induced a pleasant postprandial experience, which was significantly lower in the post-conditioning test; the effect of aversive conditioning (change from pre- to post-conditioning) was significant as compared to sham conditioning in the control group, which showed no differences between study days.

conclusionThe hedonic postprandial response to a comfort meal in healthy women is impaired by aversive conditioning. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ID: NCT04938934.

Indexed as

EatingEmotionsAffectCross-Over StudiesDigestionFemaleHumansMealsPostprandial PeriodSingle-Blind Methodaversive conditioningdigestive sensationsdigestive well-beingeating behaviourfood valencePavlovian conditioningpostprandial symptoms

Identifiers

PMID37242129
PMCPMC10221585
OpenAlexW4378516873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.