ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
An Approach for the Optimization of Thermal Conductivity and Viscosity of Hybrid (Graphene Nanoplatelets, GNPs: Cellulose Nanocrystal, CNC) Nanofluids Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM).
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thermal and rheological performance of behran oil-based nanofluids with functionalized BN, CN, and BCN nanoparticles.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Response surface methodology (RSM) is used in this study to optimize the thermal characteristics of single graphene nanoplatelets and hybrid nanofluids utilizing the miscellaneous design model. The nanofluids comprise graphene nanoplatelets and graphene nanoplatelets/cellulose nanocrystal nanoparticles in the base fluid of ethylene glycol and water (60:40). Using response surface methodology (RSM) based on central composite design (CCD) and mini tab 20 standard statistical software, the impact of temperature, volume concentration, and type of nanofluid is used to construct an empirical mathematical formula. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is applied to determine that the developed empirical mathematical analysis is relevant. For the purpose of developing the equations, 32 experiments are conducted for second-order polynomial to the specified outputs such as thermal conductivity and viscosity. Predicted estimates and the experimental data are found to be in reasonable arrangement. In additional words, the models could expect more than 85% of thermal conductivity and viscosity fluctuations of the nanofluid, indicating that the model is accurate. Optimal thermal conductivity and viscosity values are 0.4962 W/m-K and 2.6191 cP, respectively, from the results of the optimization plot. The critical parameters are 50 °C, 0.0254%, and the category factorial is GNP/CNC, and the relevant parameters are volume concentration, temperature, and kind of nanofluid. From the results plot, the composite is 0.8371. The validation results of the model during testing indicate the capability of predicting the optimal experimental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.