Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37241974›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Added Complexity!-Mechanistic Aspects of Heterobimetallic Complexes for Application in Homogeneous Catalysis.

Zeno Fickenscher, Evamarie Hey-Hawkins

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hydrogenation Reactions with Heterobimetallic Complexes.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cooperative activation of carbon-hydrogen bonds by heterobimetallic systems.Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zeno FickenscherInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, Universität Leipzig, Johannisallee 29, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5983-1288
Evamarie Hey-HawkinsInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, Universität Leipzig, Johannisallee 29, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4267-0603
Leipzig University · DE

Funding

BuildMoNa travel grant for Z.F.German-Israeli Foundation for research and development I-1508-302.5/2019Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes Doctoral grant for Z.F.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inspired by multimetallic assemblies and their role in enzyme catalysis, chemists have developed a plethora of heterobimetallic complexes for application in homogeneous catalysis. Starting with small heterobimetallic complexes with σ-donating and π-accepting ligands, such as N-heterocyclic carbene and carbonyl ligands, more and more complex systems have been developed over the past two decades. These systems can show a significant increase in catalytic activity compared with their monometallic counterparts. This increase can be attributed to new reaction pathways enabled by the presence of a second metal center in the active catalyst. This review focuses on mechanistic aspects of heterobimetallic complexes in homogeneous catalysis. Depending on the type of interaction of the second metal with the substrates, heterobimetallic complexes can be subdivided into four classes. Each of these classes is illustrated with multiple examples, showcasing the versatility of both, the types of interactions possible, and the reactions accessible.

Indexed as

electronic interactionheterobimetallic complexesmechanismsteric scaffoldingsynergistic catalysistandem catalysis

Identifiers

PMID37241974
PMCPMC10224482
OpenAlexW4377240324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.