Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37241948›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Application of Electrochemical Oxidation for Water and Wastewater Treatment: An Overview.

Mohammad Saleh Najafinejad, Simeone Chianese, Angelo Fenti, Pasquale Iovino, Dino Musmarra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Engineering Microbial-Electrochemical Interfaces for Sustainable Water Purification.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Advances in Physicochemical and Biological Treatment of Textile Wastewater: An Applied Review of Methods, Technologies, and Costs.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammad Saleh NajafinejadDepartment of Engineering, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via Roma 29, 81031 Aversa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9230-5316
Simeone ChianeseDepartment of Engineering, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via Roma 29, 81031 Aversa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9356-845X
Angelo FentiDepartment of Engineering, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via Roma 29, 81031 Aversa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4679-7970
Pasquale IovinoDepartment of Environmental, Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3614-2978
Dino MusmarraDepartment of Engineering, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via Roma 29, 81031 Aversa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7964-3791

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the discharge of various emerging pollutants, chemicals, and dyes in water and wastewater has represented one of the prominent human problems. Since water pollution is directly related to human health, highly resistant and emerging compounds in aquatic environments will pose many potential risks to the health of all living beings. Therefore, water pollution is a very acute problem that has constantly increased in recent years with the expansion of various industries. Consequently, choosing efficient and innovative wastewater treatment methods to remove contaminants is crucial. Among advanced oxidation processes, electrochemical oxidation (EO) is the most common and effective method for removing persistent pollutants from municipal and industrial wastewater. However, despite the great progress in using EO to treat real wastewater, there are still many gaps. This is due to the lack of comprehensive information on the operating parameters which affect the process and its operating costs. In this paper, among various scientific articles, the impact of operational parameters on the EO performances, a comparison between different electrochemical reactor configurations, and a report on general mechanisms of electrochemical oxidation of organic pollutants have been reported. Moreover, an evaluation of cost analysis and energy consumption requirements have also been discussed. Finally, the combination process between EO and photocatalysis (PC), called photoelectrocatalysis (PEC), has been discussed and reviewed briefly. This article shows that there is a direct relationship between important operating parameters with the amount of costs and the final removal efficiency of emerging pollutants. Optimal operating conditions can be achieved by paying special attention to reactor design, which can lead to higher efficiency and more efficient treatment. The rapid development of EO for removing emerging pollutants from impacted water and its combination with other green methods can result in more efficient approaches to face the pressing water pollution challenge. PEC proved to be a promising pollutants degradation technology, in which renewable energy sources can be adopted as a primer to perform an environmentally friendly water treatment.

Indexed as

cost analysis assessmentelectrochemical oxidationemerging pollutantsphotoelectrocatalysisrole of operational parameterswastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID37241948
PMCPMC10222772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.