ArticleMicromachines2023
MEMS Devices-Based Hand Gesture Recognition via Wearable Computing.
Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond AI-Driven Curve Fitting: Mechanistic Insight as the Cornerstone of Reliable Sensing and Accurate Fitting.Small methods · 2026Article
- Phase-Field Damage Modeling of Electromechanical Fracture in MEMS Piezoelectric Films.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sign language recognition based on dual-channel star-attention convolutional neural network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Local pattern aware 3D video swin transformer with masked autoencoding for realtime augmented reality gesture interaction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The mechanomyographic dataset of hand gestures harvested using an accelerometer and gyroscope.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Research on Flexible Sensors for Wearable Devices: A Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Design and Modelling of MEMS Vibrating Internal Ring Gyroscopes for Harsh Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Editorial for the Special Issue on Wearable and Implantable Bio-MEMS Devices and Applications.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Motion intention recognition of the affected hand based on the sEMG and improved DenseNet network.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Dataglove for Sign Language Recognition of People with Hearing and Speech Impairment via Wearable Inertial Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Data glove-based gesture recognition using CNN-BiLSTM model with attention mechanism.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gesture recognition has found widespread applications in various fields, such as virtual reality, medical diagnosis, and robot interaction. The existing mainstream gesture-recognition methods are primarily divided into two categories: inertial-sensor-based and camera-vision-based methods. However, optical detection still has limitations such as reflection and occlusion. In this paper, we investigate static and dynamic gesture-recognition methods based on miniature inertial sensors. Hand-gesture data are obtained through a data glove and preprocessed using Butterworth low-pass filtering and normalization algorithms. Magnetometer correction is performed using ellipsoidal fitting methods. An auxiliary segmentation algorithm is employed to segment the gesture data, and a gesture dataset is constructed. For static gesture recognition, we focus on four machine learning algorithms, namely support vector machine (SVM), backpropagation neural network (BP), decision tree (DT), and random forest (RF). We evaluate the model prediction performance through cross-validation comparison. For dynamic gesture recognition, we investigate the recognition of 10 dynamic gestures using Hidden Markov Models (HMM) and Attention-Biased Mechanisms for Bidirectional Long- and Short-Term Memory Neural Network Models (Attention-BiLSTM). We analyze the differences in accuracy for complex dynamic gesture recognition with different feature datasets and compare them with the prediction results of the traditional long- and short-term memory neural network model (LSTM). Experimental results demonstrate that the random forest algorithm achieves the highest recognition accuracy and shortest recognition time for static gestures. Moreover, the addition of the attention mechanism significantly improves the recognition accuracy of the LSTM model for dynamic gestures, with a prediction accuracy of 98.3%, based on the original six-axis dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.