ArticleMicromachines2023
Particle Size-Dependent Component Separation Using Serially Arrayed Micro-Chambers.
Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to enable component separation based on simple control of the flow rate. We investigated a method that eliminated the need for a centrifuge and enabled easy component separation on the spot without using a battery. Specifically, we adopted an approach that uses microfluidic devices, which are inexpensive and highly portable, and devised the channel within the fluidic device. The proposed design was a simple series of connection chambers of the same shape, connected via interconnecting channels. In this study, polystyrene particles with different sizes were used, and their behavior was evaluated by experimentally observing the flow in the chamber using a high-speed camera. It was found that the objects with larger particle diameters required more time to pass, whereas the objects with smaller particle diameters flowed in a short time; this implied that the particles with a smaller size could be extracted more rapidly from the outlet. By plotting the trajectories of the particles for each unit of time, the passing speed of the objects with large particle diameters was confirmed to be particularly low. It was also possible to trap the particles within the chamber if the flow rate was below a specific threshold. By applying this property to blood, for instance, we expected plasma components and red blood cells to be extracted first.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.