ArticleMicromachines2023
Hyperelastic Modeling and Validation of Hybrid-Actuated Soft Robot with Pressure-Stiffening.
Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Segment Extendable Soft Manipulator Driven by a Pneumatic-Tendon Coupling Mechanism.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advanced Robotics for the Next-Generation of Cardiac Interventions.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Design and Evaluation of Augmented Reality-Enhanced Robotic System for Epidural Interventions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Editorial for the Special Issue on Soft Actuators: Design, Fabrication and Applications.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Quasi-Static Modeling Framework for Soft Bellow-Based Biomimetic Actuators.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Stereo Visual Servoing Control of a Soft Endoscope for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Design Optimization of a Hybrid-Driven Soft Surgical Robot with Biomimetic Constraints.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soft robots have gained popularity, especially in intraluminal applications, because their soft bodies make them safer for surgical interventions than flexures with rigid backbones. This study investigates a pressure-regulating stiffness tendon-driven soft robot and provides a continuum mechanics model for it towards using that in adaptive stiffness applications. To this end, first, a central single-chamber pneumatic and tri-tendon-driven soft robot was designed and fabricated. Afterward, the classic Cosserat's rod model was adopted and augmented with the hyperelastic material model. The model was then formulated as a boundary-value problem and was solved using the shooting method. To identify the pressure-stiffening effect, a parameter-identification problem was formulated to identify the relationship between the flexural rigidity of the soft robot and internal pressure. The flexural rigidity of the robot at various pressures was optimized to match theoretical deformation and experiments. The theoretical findings of arbitrary pressures were then compared with the experiment for validation. The internal chamber pressure was in the range of 0 to 40 kPa and the tendon tensions were in the range of 0 to 3 N. The theoretical and experimental findings were in fair agreement for tip displacement with a maximum error of 6.40% of the flexure's length.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.