Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37241019›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2023

Predicting Hospital Ward Admission from the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.

Nekane Larburu, Laiene Azkue, Jon Kerexeta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Novel Machine-Learning Modeling of Facial Trauma Volume With Regional Event and Weather Data.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nekane LarburuVicomtech Foundation, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), 20009 Donostia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0248-7783
Laiene AzkueVicomtech Foundation, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), 20009 Donostia, Spain.ORCID 0009-0009-2266-7985
Jon KerexetaVicomtech Foundation, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), 20009 Donostia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6516-8619

Funding

Basque Government ZL-2023/00568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergency department (ED) is often overburdened, due to the high influx of patients and limited availability of attending physicians. This situation highlights the need for improvement in the management of, and assistance provided in the ED. A key point for this purpose is the identification of patients with the highest risk, which can be achieved using machine learning predictive models. The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review of predictive models used to detect ward admissions from the ED. The main targets of this review are the best predictive algorithms, their predictive capacity, the studies' quality, and the predictor variables.

methodsThis review is based on PRISMA methodology. The information has been searched in PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases. Quality assessment has been performed using the QUIPS tool.

resultsThrough the advanced search, a total of 367 articles were found, of which 14 were of interest that met the inclusion criteria. Logistic regression is the most used predictive model, achieving AUC values between 0.75-0.92. The two most used variables are the age and ED triage category.

conclusionsartificial intelligence models can contribute to improving the quality of care in the ED and reducing the burden on healthcare systems.

Indexed as

admissionadmission risk prediction modelemergency departmentpatients

Identifiers

PMID37241019
PMCPMC10223617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.