Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37240990›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023

Detection of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation from Dynamic ECG Recordings Based on a Deep Learning Model.

Yating Hu, Tengfei Feng, Miao Wang, Chengyu Liu, Hong Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yating HuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Tengfei FengDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical School, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1111-5837
Miao WangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1784-1178
Chengyu LiuSchool of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Hong TangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7438-054X
Dalian University of Technology · CNRWTH Aachen University · DESoutheast University · CN

Funding

Dalian Science and Technology Innovation Fund 2021JJ12WZ47National Natural Science Foundation of China 61971089 and 61471081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesAtrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common arrhythmias clinically. Aging tends to increase the risk of AF, which also increases the burden of other comorbidities, including coronary artery disease (CAD), and even heart failure (HF). The precise detection of AF is a challenge due to its intermittence and unpredictability. A method for the accurate detection of AF is still needed.

methodsA deep learning model was used to detect atrial fibrillation. Here, a distinction was not made between AF and atrial flutter (AFL), both of which manifest as a similar pattern on an electrocardiogram (ECG). This method not only discriminated AF from normal rhythm of the heart, but also detected its onset and offset. The proposed model involved residual blocks and a Transformer encoder. RESULTS AND

conclusionsThe data used for training were obtained from the CPSC2021 Challenge, and were collected using dynamic ECG devices. Tests on four public datasets validated the availability of the proposed method. The best performance for AF rhythm testing attained an accuracy of 98.67%, a sensitivity of 87.69%, and a specificity of 98.56%. In onset and offset detection, it obtained a sensitivity of 95.90% and 87.70%, respectively. The algorithm with a low FPR of 0.46% was able to reduce troubling false alarms. The model had a great capability to discriminate AF from normal rhythm and to detect its onset and offset. Noise stress tests were conducted after mixing three types of noise. We visualized the model's features using a heatmap and illustrated its interpretability. The model focused directly on the crucial ECG waveform where showed obvious characteristics of AF.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationdeep learningelectrocardiogramTransformer

Identifiers

PMID37240990
PMCPMC10220587
OpenAlexW4376254067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.