ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2023
Review of Endometrial Receptivity Array: A Personalized Approach to Embryo Transfer and Its Clinical Applications.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of intrauterine hCG perfusion efficacy in recurrent implantation failure as defined by ESHRE guidelines.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Pooled it
- Novel Models to Predict Pregnancy for Patients Receiving In-Vitro-Fertilization Embryo Transfer: The Significance of Clinical Indicators and Key Gene Expression in the Endometrium.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- Biomarkers for Endometrial Receptivity: Implications for Infertility, Implantation Failure, and Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Multi-omics biomarkers in female fertility: from oocyte quality to endometrial receptivity and clinical translation.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Investigation of the effects of recombinant and urinary FSH used for ovulation induction on pregnancy results in an experimental animal model in terms of endometrial receptivity markers.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Phenotype- and phase-directed immune interpretation in recurrent implantation failure and pregnancy loss: an integrative framework.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
- Retrospective Evaluation of Transvaginal Sonography, Saline Infusion Sonography, and Hysterosalpingography for Detecting Endometrial Polyps in 256 Infertile Women.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram integrating endometrial ultrasound parameters to predict clinical pregnancy in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Review
- Asynchrony Between Endometrial miRNA- and mRNA-Based Receptivity Stages Associated with Impaired Receptivity in Recurrent Implantation Failure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Molecular and biological markers for assessing endometrial receptivity in infertile women: A narrative review.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Review
- The study on the clinical efficacy of endometrial receptivity analysis and influence factors of displaced window of implantation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Adiponectin receptor 1 regulates endometrial receptivity via the adenosine monophosphate‑activated protein kinase/E‑cadherin pathway.Molecular medicine reports · 2024Article
- Progesterone in frozen embryo transfer cycles: assays, circulating concentrations, metabolites, and molecular action.F&S reports · 2024Article
- Endometrial E-cadherin and N-cadherin Expression during the Mid-Secretory Phase of Women with Ovarian Endometrioma or Uterine Fibroids.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- A Comprehensive Review of the Endometrial Receptivity Array in Euploid Embryo Transfer Cycles.Cureus · 2024Review
- A Case Report on Endometrial Receptivity Array Test for Infertile Patient to Enhance Reproductive Outcomes.Cureus · 2024Article
- Personalized embryo transfer guided by rsERT improves pregnancy outcomes in patients with repeated implantation failure.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Role of Endometrial Extracellular Vesicles in Mediating Cell-to-Cell Communication in the Uterus: A Review.Cells · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Successful outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) rely on both the formation of a chromosomally normal embryo and its implantation in a receptive endometrium. Pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has been widely accepted as a tool to assess the viability of an embryo. In 2011, the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) was first published as a tool to determine when the endometrium is most receptive to an embryo, commonly referred to as the "window of implantation" (WOI). The ERA uses molecular arrays to assess proliferation and differentiation in the endometrium and screens for inflammatory markers. Unlike PGT-A, there has been dissent within the field concerning the efficacy of the ERA. Many studies that contest the success of the ERA found that it did not improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with an already-good prognosis. Alternatively, studies that utilized the ERA in patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF) and transfer of known euploid embryos demonstrated improved outcomes. This review aims to describe the ERA as a novel technique, review the various settings that the ERA may be used in, such as natural frozen embryo transfer (nFET) and hormone replacement therapy frozen embryo transfer (HRT-FET), and provide a summary of the recent clinical data for embryo transfers in patients with RIF utilizing the ERA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.