Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37240907›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2023

The Role of Cold Atmospheric Plasma in Wound Healing Processes in Critically Ill Patients.

Tatiana Bolgeo, Antonio Maconi, Menada Gardalini, Denise Gatti, Roberta Di Matteo, Marco Lapidari, Yaroslava Longhitano, Gabriele Savioli, Andrea Piccioni, Christian Zanza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Cold Atmospheric Plasma in Wound Healing: Molecular Mechanism of Action.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tatiana BolgeoDepartment of Integrated Research and Innovation Activities, AON SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15121 Alessandria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7322-7009
Antonio MaconiDepartment of Integrated Research and Innovation Activities, AON SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15121 Alessandria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1904-7277
Menada GardaliniDepartment of Integrated Research and Innovation Activities, AON SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15121 Alessandria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9218-4414
Denise GattiDepartment of Integrated Research and Innovation Activities, AON SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15121 Alessandria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9806-5360
Roberta Di MatteoDepartment of Integrated Research and Innovation Activities, AON SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15121 Alessandria, Italy.
Marco LapidariDepartment of Vascular Surgery, St. Antonio and Biagio and Cesare Arrigo Hospital, 15121 Alessandria, Italy.
Yaroslava LonghitanoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8831-1361
Gabriele SavioliDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Surgery, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8679-5435
Andrea PiccioniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5703-8737
Christian ZanzaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo · ITUniversity of Pittsburgh · USPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critically ill patients are at risk of skin wounds, which reduce their quality of life, complicate their pharmacological regimens, and prolong their hospital stays in intensive care units (ICUs), while also increasing overall mortality and morbidity rates. Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) has been proposed as a viable option for many biological and medical applications, given its capacity to reduce wound bacterial contamination and promote wound healing. The aim of this narrative review is to describe how CAP works and its operating mechanisms, as well as reporting its possible applications in critical care settings. The success of CAP in the treatment of wounds, in particular, bedsores or pressure sores, presents an innovative path in the prevention of nosocomial infections and an opportunity of reducing the negative implications of these diseases for the NHS. This narrative review of the literature was conducted following the 'Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles' (SANRA) methodology. Previous literature highlights three biological effects of plasma: inactivation of a wide range of microorganisms, including those that are multi-drug-resistant; increased cell proliferation and angiogenesis with a shorter period of plasma treatment; and apoptosis stimulation with a longer and more intensive treatment. CAP is effective in many areas of the medical field, with no significant adverse effects on healthy cells. However, its use can produce potentially serious side effects and should, therefore, be used under expert supervision and in appropriate doses.

Indexed as

cold atmospheric plasmacritical careinfectionwound

Identifiers

PMID37240907
PMCPMC10219374
OpenAlexW4367181892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.