ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2023
Concurrent Diagnosis of Adenomyosis and Congenital Uterine Anomalies: A Review.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-Coding RNAs (microRNAs, lncRNAs, circRNAs) in Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review of Mechanistic and Translational Evidence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Adenomyosis and dysmorphic uterus: is there a correlation? Analysis of reproductive outcomes after hysteroscopic metroplasty.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2025Article
- Delayed diagnosis of Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome with diffuse adenomyosis in bilateral horns.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Article
- A new treatment for Robert's uterus with adenomyosis: a case report and review of the literature.BMC women's health · 2024Review
- Risk factors and nomogram construction for predicting women with chronic pelvic pain:a cross-sectional population study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.