Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37240860›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Review of Feeding Systems Affecting Production, Carcass Attributes, and Meat Quality of Ovine and Caprine Species.

Tiantian Ke, Mengyu Zhao, Xiaoan Zhang, Yao Cheng, Yiming Sun, Penghui Wang, Chunhuan Ren, Xiao Cheng, Zijun Zhang, Yafeng Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Isolation and Characterization ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. The Effects of Composite Alkali-Stored SpentAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tiantian KeCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Mengyu ZhaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Xiaoan ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Yao ChengCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Yiming SunCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Penghui WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Chunhuan RenCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Xiao ChengCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Zijun ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4292-4709
Yafeng HuangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7878-3402

Funding

Anhui Agricultural University's Scientific Research Funding Projects for Introducing and Stabling Talents rc392009Central Committee Guide Local Science and Technology Development Special project of Anhui Province 22239030funding from undergraduate innovation and entrepreneurship training program of China ds213910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growth rate, carcass attributes, and meat quality traits of small ruminants (i.e., sheep and goats) depend on various factors, among which the feeding system is one of the most important factors. However, how feeding systems affect these parameters differ between sheep and goats. Therefore, this review aimed to evaluate the differences in how different feeding systems affect the growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of sheep and goats. It also explored the effects of a new finishing strategy-time-limited grazing with supplements on these traits. Compared with stalled feeding, finishing lambs/kids on pasture-only feed reduced the average daily gain (ADG) and carcass yield, while supplemented-grazing lambs/kids had near-equivalent or higher ADG and carcass attributes. Pasture-grazing increased the meat flavor intensity and healthy fatty acid content (HFAC) of lamb/kid meat. Supplemental grazing lambs had comparable or superior meat sensory attributes and increased meat protein and HFAC compared to stall-fed ones. In contrast, supplemental grazing only improved the meat color of kids but had little effect on other meat qualities. Moreover, time-limited grazing with supplemental concentrates increased the carcass yield and meat quality in lamb meat. Overall, the effects of different feeding systems on growth performance and carcass traits were comparable between sheep and goats but differed in terms of the meat quality.

Indexed as

carcass attributesfeeding systemsgrowth ratemeat qualitysmall ruminants

Identifiers

PMID37240860
PMCPMC10224127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.