ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of healing effectiveness of different debridement approaches for diabetic foot ulcers: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- Evaluation of the pro-healing effect of a commercial formulation of aqueous extract of Triticum vulgare in hyperglycemic miceBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2026Article
- Multifunctional Hydrogels for Diabetic Wound Healing: Design Strategies and Microenvironmental Remodeling Mechanisms.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multimodal Management of a Large Postsurgical Wound Secondary to Nodulectomy in a Dog: Application of the TIME Framework, Tie-Over Fixation, Fluorescence Biomodulation, and Electrobioregulation.Case reports in veterinary medicine · 2026Article
- Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Wound Repair: From Biology to Therapeutic Innovation.Cells · 2025Review
- Biological Models for Evaluating Hydrogel-Based Formulations in Wound Healing.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancements in Regenerative Hydrogels in Skin Wound Treatment: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Efficacy of a Novel RigenaseMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Observational
- Clinical Efficacy of Hyaluronic Acid with Iodine in Hard-to-Heal Wounds.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of dressings is an essential component of the standard of care for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs); however, despite the wide variety of dressings available, there is a lack of evidence from head-to-head randomized controlled trials. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of
methodsThis study involved a monocentric, two-arm, open-label, controlled trial in patients with DFUs (Grades I or II, Stage A or C, based on the Texas classification) randomized to 12 weeks of dressing with Fitostimoline
resultsA total of 40 adult patients were recruited (20 patients in each treatment group). The proportion of patients with complete healing was similar between the two groups (61% vs. 74%,
conclusionsIn a clinical setting, the use of Fitostimoline
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.