Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37240682›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Efficacy and Safety of Dry Powder Antibiotics: A Narrative Review.

David de la Rosa-Carrillo, Guillermo Suárez-Cuartín, Oriol Sibila, Rafael Golpe, Rosa-María Girón, Miguel-Ángel Martínez-García

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Therapeutic Interventions forJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. [Highlights 56th SEPAR Congress].Open respiratory archives
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

David de la Rosa-CarrilloRespiratory Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, 08041 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0753-1771
Guillermo Suárez-CuartínRespiratory Department, Hospital de Bellvitge, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Oriol SibilaRespiratory Department, Hospital Clínic i Provincial, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Rafael GolpeRespiratory Department, Hospital Lucus Augusti, 27003 Lugo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3759-5322
Rosa-María GirónRespiratory Department, Hospital de la Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7094-0848
Miguel-Ángel Martínez-GarcíaRespiratory Department, Hospital La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7321-1891
Bellvitge University Hospital · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESHospital Universitario Lucus Augusti · ESLeitat Technological Center · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of inhaled antibiotics was initially almost exclusively confined to patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). However, it has been extended in recent decades to patients with non-CF bronchiectasis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who present with chronic bronchial infection by potentially pathogenic microorganisms. Inhaled antibiotics reach high concentrations in the area of infection, which enhances their effect and enables their long-term administration to defeat the most resistant infections, while minimizing possible adverse effects. New formulations of inhaled dry powder antibiotics have been developed, providing, among other advantages, faster preparation and administration of the drug, as well as avoiding the requirement to clean nebulization equipment. In this review, we analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the different types of devices that allow the inhalation of antibiotics, especially dry powder inhalers. We describe their general characteristics, the different inhalers on the market and the proper way to use them. We analyze the factors that influence the way in which the dry powder drug reaches the lower airways, as well as aspects of microbiological effectiveness and risks of resistance development. We review the scientific evidence on the use of colistin and tobramycin with this type of device, both in patients with CF and with non-CF bronchiectasis. Finally, we discuss the literature on the development of new dry powder antibiotics.

Indexed as

antibioticsbronchiectasischronic bronchial infectioncystic fibrosisdry powder antibioticsinhalation drugPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID37240682
PMCPMC10219413
OpenAlexW4377291707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.