ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
The Controversial Definition of Normal Toe Alignment.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reliability of Angle Measurements Based on the Epiphyseal Scar for Knee Osteotomy: An International Multicenter Radiographic Study.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- A Lightweight Browser-Based Tool for Collaborative and Blinded Image Analysis.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- Restoration of preoperative tibial alignment improves functional results after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- A Novel Tool for Collaborative and Blinded Orthopedic Image Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
"Normal" and "abnormal" are frequently used in surgical planning and to evaluate surgical results of the forefoot. However, there is no objectifiable value of metatarsophalangeal angles (MTPAs) 2-5 in the dorsoplantar (DP) view with which to objectively evaluate lesser toe alignment. We aimed to determine which angles are considered to be "normal" by orthopedic surgeons and radiologists. Thirty anonymized radiographs of feet were submitted twice in randomized order to determine the respective MTPAs 2-5. After six weeks, the anonymized radiographs and photographs of the same feet without apparent affiliation were presented again. The terms "normal," "borderline normal," and "abnormal" were assigned by the observers. Viewers considered MTP-2 alignment from 0° to -20° to be normal, and below -30° abnormal; MTP-3, 0° to -15° to be normal and below -30° abnormal; MTP-4, 0° to -10° normal and below -20° abnormal. Between 5° valgus and 15° varus was the range of MTP-5 recognized as normal. High intra-observer but low interobserver reliability with overall low correlation of clinical and radiographic aspects was observed. The assessment of the terms "normal" or "abnormal" are subject to a high degree of variation. Therefore, these terms should be used cautiously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.