Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37240612›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly U.S. Population: A Cross-Sectional Study of Treatment Trends and Comparison of Complication Rates after Joint Replacement, Open Reduction and Internal Fixation, and Non-Surgical Management.

Nike Walter, Dominik Szymski, Moritz Riedl, Steven M Kurtz, Volker Alt, David W Lowenberg, Edmund C Lau, Markus Rupp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Proximal humerus fractures: Treatment controversies.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nike WalterDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0654-2076
Dominik SzymskiDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1739-8524
Moritz RiedlDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Steven M KurtzImplant Research Center, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Volker AltDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0208-4650
David W LowenbergDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94063, USA.
Edmund C LauExponent Inc., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Markus RuppDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7221-3783
University Hospital Regensburg · DEDrexel University · USExponent (United States) · USStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proximal humerus fracture (PHF) treatment remains challenging. Multiple therapy options exist, and the optimal choice of management has been increasingly discussed in the literature. The aim of this study was to (1) analyze trends in the propensity of proximal humerus fracture treatments and (2) compare complication rates after joint replacement, surgical repair, and non-surgical treatment in terms of mechanical complications, union failure, and infection rates. In this cross-sectional study, patients aged 65 years or older with proximal humerus fractures occurring between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019 were identified from Medicare physician service claims records. The Kaplan-Meier method with the Fine and Gray adjustment was used to calculate the cumulative incidence rates for malunion/nonunion, infection, and mechanical complications for the following treatment categories: shoulder arthroplasty, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and non-surgical treatment, respectively. Semiparametric Cox regression was performed incorporating 23 demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic covariates to determine risk factors. Between 2009 through 2019, conservative procedures decreased by 0.9%. ORIF procedures decreased from 9.51% (95% CI: 8.7-10.4) to 6.95% (95% CI: 6.2-7.7), whereas shoulder arthroplasties rose from 1.99% (95% CI: 1.6-2.4), to 5.45% (95% CI: 4.8-6.2). PHFs managed through ORIF were associated with higher union failure rates compared to conservatively treated fractures (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.15-1.5,

Indexed as

complication ratesepidemiologyproximal humerus fracturesrisk factorstreatment

Identifiers

PMID37240612
PMCPMC10219066
OpenAlexW4377043294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.