Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37240604›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Primary Tumour Treatment in Stage 4 Colorectal Cancer with Unresectable Liver and Lung Metastases and No Peritoneal Carcinomatosis-Current Trends and Attitudes in the Absence of Clear Guidelines.

Giovanni Domenico Tebala, Antonio Di Cintio, Francesco Ricci, Stefano Avenia, Roberto Cirocchi, Jacopo Desiderio, Domenico Di Nardo, Salomone Di Saverio, Alessandro Gemini, Maria Chiara Ranucci and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanni Domenico TebalaDepartment of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7152-4096
Antonio Di CintioDepartment of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy.
Francesco RicciDepartment of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy.
Stefano AveniaDepartment of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy.
Roberto CirocchiDepartment of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2457-0636
Jacopo DesiderioDepartment of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy.
Domenico Di NardoDepartment of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy.
Salomone Di SaverioDepartment of General Surgery, "Madonna del Soccorso" Hospital, 63074 San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy.
Alessandro GeminiDepartment of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6691-0881
Maria Chiara RanucciDepartment of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5765-8143
Stefano TrastulliDepartment of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy.
Fabio CianchiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, "Careggi" University Hospital, 50134 Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6936-8693
Marco ScatizziDepartment of General Surgery, "S. Maria Annunziata e Serratori" Hospital, 50012 Firenze, Italy.
Fausto CatenaDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, "Maurizio Bufalini" Hospital, 47521 Cesena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5558-9965
The MeCC-International Collaborative
Santa Maria Nuova Hospital · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITOspedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena · ITOspedale Santa Maria Annunziata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment of the primary tumour in colorectal cancer with unresectable liver and/or lung metastases but no peritoneal carcinomatosis is still a matter of debate. In the absence of clear evidence and guidelines, our survey was aimed at obtaining a snapshot of the current attitudes and the rationales for the choice of offering resection of the primary tumour (RPT) despite the presence of untreatable metastases.

methodsAn online survey was administered to medical professionals worldwide. The survey had three sections: (1) demographics of the respondent, (2) case scenarios and (3) general questions. For each respondent, an "elective resection score" and an "emergency resection score" were calculated as a percentage of the times he or she would offer RPT in the elective and in the emergency case scenarios. They were correlated to independent variables such as age, type of affiliation and specific workload.

resultsMost respondents would offer palliative chemotherapy as the first choice in elective scenarios, while a more aggressive approach with RPT would be reserved for younger patients with good performance status and in emergency situations. Respondents younger than 50 years old and those with a specific workload of fewer than 40 cases of colorectal cancer per year tend to be more conservative.

conclusionsIn the absence of clear guidelines and evidence, there is a lack of consensus on the treatment of the primary tumour in case of colon cancer with unresectable liver and/or lung metastases and no peritoneal carcinomatosis. Palliative chemotherapy seems to be the first option, but more consistent evidence is needed to guide this choice.

Indexed as

colon cancerliver metastaseslung metastasesprimary tumour

Identifiers

PMID37240604
PMCPMC10219093
OpenAlexW4377041196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.