Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37240464›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Machine Learning for Prediction of Technical Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion.

Tatsuya Nakachi, Masahisa Yamane, Koichi Kishi, Toshiya Muramatsu, Hisayuki Okada, Yuji Oikawa, Ryohei Yoshikawa, Tomohiro Kawasaki, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Osamu Katoh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tatsuya NakachiDepartment of Cardiology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Nanbu Hospital, 3-2-10 Konandai, Konan-ku, Yokohama 234-0054, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4384-6618
Masahisa YamaneCardiology Department, Saitama Sekishinkai Hospital, 2-37-20 Irumagawa, Sayama, Saitama 350-1305, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5649-4677
Koichi KishiDepartment of Cardiology, Tokushima Red Cross Hospital, 103 Irinokuchi, Komatsushima-cho, Komatsushima, Tokushima 773-8502, Japan.
Toshiya MuramatsuDepartment of Cardiology, Tokyo Heart Center, 5-4-12 Kitashinagawa, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141-0001, Japan.
Hisayuki OkadaDepartment of Cardiology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu 430-8558, Japan.
Yuji OikawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Cardiovascular Institute, 3-2-19 Nishiazabu, Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-0031, Japan.
Ryohei YoshikawaCardiology Center, Sanda City Hospital, 3-1-1 Keyakidai, Sanda, Hyogo 669-1321, Japan.
Tomohiro KawasakiDepartment of Cardiology, Shin-Koga Hospital, 120 Tenjin-cho, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-8577, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4795-7745
Hiroyuki TanakaDepartment of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama 710-8602, Japan.
Osamu KatohDepartment of Cardiology, Kusatsu Heart Center, 407-1 Komaizawa-cho, Kusatsu, Shiga 525-0014, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The probability of technical success in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) represents essential information for specifying the priority of PCI for treatment selection in patients with CTO. However, the predictabilities of existing scores based on conventional regression analysis remain modest, leaving room for improvements in model discrimination. Recently, machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged as highly effective methods for prediction and decision-making in various disciplines. We therefore investigated the predictability of ML models for technical results of CTO-PCI and compared their performances to the results from existing scores, including J-CTO, CL, and CASTLE scores. (2) Methods: This analysis used data from the Japanese CTO-PCI expert registry, which enrolled 8760 consecutive patients undergoing CTO-PCI. The performance of prediction models was assessed using the area under the receiver operating curve (ROC-AUC). (3) Results: Technical success was achieved in 7990 procedures, accounting for an overall success rate of 91.2%. The best ML model, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), outperformed the conventional prediction scores with ROC-AUC (XGBoost 0.760 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.740-0.780] vs. J-CTO 0.697 [95%CI: 0.675-0.719], CL 0.662 [95%CI: 0.639-0.684], CASTLE 0.659 [95%CI: 0.636-0.681];

Indexed as

chronic total coronary occlusionmachine learningpercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID37240464
PMCPMC10218988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.