ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Receptor-Ligand Binding: Effect of Mechanical Factors.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anticonvulsant Effects of Citronellal, Daidzin, and Phytol, Possibly Through GABABrain and behavior · 2026Article
- L-Quebrachitol Enhances Sedative Effect of Diazepam Through GABAergic Pathway: Animal and Computational Studies.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Genetics-Based Targeting Strategies for Precise Neuromodulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Decoding deception: the binding affinity of cuttlefish ink on shark smell receptors.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Advanced Quantification of Receptor-Ligand Interaction Lifetimes via Single-Molecule FRET Microscopy.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Plasmodium vivax tryptophan-rich antigen reduces type I collagen secretion via the NF-κBp65 pathway in splenic fibroblasts.Parasites & vectors · 2024Article
- Theory and Examples of Catch Bonds.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gaining insight into the in situ receptor-ligand binding is pivotal for revealing the molecular mechanisms underlying the physiological and pathological processes and will contribute to drug discovery and biomedical application. An important issue involved is how the receptor-ligand binding responds to mechanical stimuli. This review aims to provide an overview of the current understanding of the effect of several representative mechanical factors, such as tension, shear stress, stretch, compression, and substrate stiffness on receptor-ligand binding, wherein the biomedical implications are focused. In addition, we highlight the importance of synergistic development of experimental and computational methods for fully understanding the in situ receptor-ligand binding, and further studies should focus on the coupling effects of these mechanical factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.