Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37240063›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Evolution of Resistance to Irinotecan in Cancer Cells Involves Generation of Topoisomerase-Guided Mutations in Non-Coding Genome That Reduce the Chances of DNA Breaks.

Santosh Kumar, Valid Gahramanov, Shivani Patel, Julia Yaglom, Lukasz Kaczmarczyk, Ivan A Alexandrov, Gabi Gerlitz, Mali Salmon-Divon, Michael Y Sherman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Santosh KumarDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1744-337X
Valid GahramanovDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.
Shivani PatelDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0906-2841
Julia YaglomDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.
Lukasz KaczmarczykDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.
Ivan A AlexandrovDepartment of Anatomy and Anthropology & Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Gabi GerlitzDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-6422-8715
Mali Salmon-DivonAdelson School of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7272-0846
Michael Y ShermanDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7392-320X
Ariel University · ILTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

NIH HHS RA1800000163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resistance to chemotherapy is a leading cause of treatment failure. Drug resistance mechanisms involve mutations in specific proteins or changes in their expression levels. It is commonly understood that resistance mutations happen randomly prior to treatment and are selected during the treatment. However, the selection of drug-resistant mutants in culture could be achieved by multiple drug exposures of cloned genetically identical cells and thus cannot result from the selection of pre-existent mutations. Accordingly, adaptation must involve the generation of mutations de novo upon drug treatment. Here we explored the origin of resistance mutations to a widely used Top1 inhibitor, irinotecan, which triggers DNA breaks, causing cytotoxicity. The resistance mechanism involved the gradual accumulation of recurrent mutations in non-coding regions of DNA at Top1-cleavage sites. Surprisingly, cancer cells had a higher number of such sites than the reference genome, which may define their increased sensitivity to irinotecan. Homologous recombination repairs of DNA double-strand breaks at these sites following initial drug exposures gradually reverted cleavage-sensitive "cancer" sequences back to cleavage-resistant "normal" sequences. These mutations reduced the generation of DNA breaks upon subsequent exposures, thus gradually increasing drug resistance. Together, large target sizes for mutations and their Top1-guided generation lead to their gradual and rapid accumulation, synergistically accelerating the development of resistance.

Indexed as

CamptothecinNeoplasmsDNADNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIrinotecanMutationCamptothecinDNADNA Topoisomerases, Type IIrinotecanDNA repairdose escalationmutationsnon-coding genomeSN38 resistance

Identifiers

PMID37240063
PMCPMC10218574
OpenAlexW4378515903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.