Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37239893›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Multiparametric Dynamic Ultrasound Approach for Differential Diagnosis of Primary Liver Tumors.

Maria Elena Ainora, Lucia Cerrito, Antonio Liguori, Irene Mignini, Angela De Luca, Linda Galasso, Matteo Garcovich, Laura Riccardi, Francesca Ponziani, Francesco Santopaolo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Elena AinoraCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione PoliclinicoUniversitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome (Italy), 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5847-1065
Lucia CerritoCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione PoliclinicoUniversitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome (Italy), 00168 Rome, Italy.
Antonio LiguoriCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione PoliclinicoUniversitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome (Italy), 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0801-7152
Irene MigniniCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione PoliclinicoUniversitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome (Italy), 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8192-631X
Angela De LucaInternal Medicine, University Hospital, 70100 Bari, Italy.
Linda GalassoCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione PoliclinicoUniversitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome (Italy), 00168 Rome, Italy.
Matteo GarcovichCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione PoliclinicoUniversitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome (Italy), 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5805-7953
Laura RiccardiCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione PoliclinicoUniversitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome (Italy), 00168 Rome, Italy.
Francesca PonzianiCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione PoliclinicoUniversitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome (Italy), 00168 Rome, Italy.
Francesco SantopaoloCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione PoliclinicoUniversitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome (Italy), 00168 Rome, Italy.
Maurizio PompiliCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione PoliclinicoUniversitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome (Italy), 00168 Rome, Italy.
Antonio GasbarriniCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione PoliclinicoUniversitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome (Italy), 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6230-1779
Maria Assunta ZoccoCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione PoliclinicoUniversitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome (Italy), 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0814-9542
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A correct differentiation between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intracellular cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is essential for clinical management and prognostic prediction. However, non-invasive differential diagnosis between HCC and ICC remains highly challenging. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (D-CEUS) with standardized software is a valuable tool in the diagnostic approach to focal liver lesions and could improve accuracy in the evaluation of tumor perfusion. Moreover, the measurement of tissue stiffness could add more information concerning tumoral environment. To explore the diagnostic performance of multiparametric ultrasound (MP-US) in differentiating ICC from HCC. Our secondary aim was to develop an US score for distinguishing ICC and HCC. Between January 2021 and September 2022 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed HCC and ICC were enrolled in this prospective monocentric study. A complete US evaluation including B mode, D-CEUS and shear wave elastography (SWE) was performed in all patients and the corresponding features were compared between the tumor entities. For better inter-individual comparability, the blood volume-related D-CEUS parameters were analyzed as a ratio between lesions and surrounding liver parenchyma. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was performed to select the most useful independent variables for the differential diagnosis between HCC and ICC and to establish an US score for non-invasive diagnosis. Finally, the diagnostic performance of the score was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. A total of 82 patients (mean age ± SD, 68 ± 11 years, 55 men) were enrolled, including 44 ICC and 38 HCC. No statistically significant differences in basal US features were found between HCC and ICC. Concerning D-CEUS, blood volume parameters (peak intensity, PE; area under the curve, AUC; and wash-in rate, WiR) showed significantly higher values in the HCC group, but PE was the only independent feature associated with HCC diagnosis at multivariate analysis (

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCholangiocarcinomaLiver NeoplasmsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMaleProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyContrast Mediadynamic contrast enhanced ultrasoundelastographyHCCICCmultiparametric ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37239893
PMCPMC10218249
OpenAlexW4376138711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.