Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37239870›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Quantitative Aspects of the Human Cell Proteome.

Stanislav Naryzhny

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Proteomics and Its Applications in Cancers 2.0.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stanislav NaryzhnyInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Pogodinskaya Str. 10, 119121 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4102-3423
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number and identity of proteins and proteoforms presented in a single human cell (a cellular proteome) are fundamental biological questions. The answers can be found with sophisticated and sensitive proteomics methods, including advanced mass spectrometry (MS) coupled with separation by gel electrophoresis and chromatography. So far, bioinformatics and experimental approaches have been applied to quantitate the complexity of the human proteome. This review analyzed the quantitative information obtained from several large-scale panoramic experiments in which high-resolution mass spectrometry-based proteomics in combination with liquid chromatography or two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) were used to evaluate the cellular proteome. It is important that even though all these experiments were performed in different labs using different equipment and calculation algorithms, the main conclusion about the distribution of proteome components (proteins or proteoforms) was basically the same for all human tissues or cells. It follows Zipf's law and has a formula N = A/x, where N is the number of proteoforms, A is a coefficient, and x is the limit of proteoform detection in terms of abundance.

Indexed as

ProteomeTandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, LiquidElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalHumansProteomeformulahuman proteomequantitation

Identifiers

PMID37239870
PMCPMC10218018
OpenAlexW4378516715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.