Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37239866›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

A Case-Control Study by ddPCR of ALU 260/111 and LINE-1 266/97 Copy Number Ratio in Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Plasma Revealed LINE-1 266/97 as a Potential Biomarker for Early Breast Cancer Detection.

Marina Bortul, Fabiola Giudici, Domenico Tierno, Daniele Generali, Serena Scomersi, Gabriele Grassi, Cristina Bottin, Maria Rosa Cappelletti, Fabrizio Zanconati, Bruna Scaggiante

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marina BortulDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy.
Fabiola GiudiciCancer Epidemiologic Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 33081 Aviano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4160-3479
Domenico TiernoDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0858-6192
Daniele GeneraliDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6002-1530
Serena ScomersiBreast Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI), 34149 Trieste, Italy.
Gabriele GrassiDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9704-6651
Cristina BottinDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy.
Maria Rosa CappellettiBreast Cancer Unit and Translational Research Unit, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale di Cremona-ASST, 26100 Cremona, Italy.
Fabrizio ZanconatiDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy.
Bruna ScaggianteDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8662-138X

Funding

Beneficentia Stiftung BEN 2016/16Lega Italiana per la Lotta ai Tumori research grant 2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Western countries, breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women. Early detection has a positive impact on survival, quality of life, and public health costs. Mammography screening programs have increased early detection rates, but new approaches to more personalized surveillance could further improve diagnosis. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in blood could provide a potential tool for early diagnosis by analyzing cfDNA quantity, circulating tumor DNA mutations, or cfDNA integrity (cfDI).

methodsPlasma was obtained from the blood of 106 breast cancer patients (cases) and 103 healthy women (controls). Digital droplet PCR was used for the determination of ALU 260/111 bp and LINE-1 266/97 bp copy number ratio and cfDI. cfDNA abundance was calculated using copies of the

resultsCases had significantly lower ALU 260/111 or LINE-1 266/97 copy number ratios (median; ALU 260/111 = 0.08, LINE-1 266/97 = 0.20), compared with control (median; ALU 260/111 = 0.10, LINE-1 266/97 = 0.28) (

conclusionsAnalysis of LINE-1 266/97 copy number ratio or cfDI by ddPCR appears to be a useful noninvasive test that could aid in early BC detection. Further studies in a large cohort are needed to validate the biomarker.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA, NeoplasmFemaleHumansPeptide Elongation Factor 1Polymerase Chain ReactionQuality of LifeBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA, NeoplasmEEF1A2 protein, humanPeptide Elongation Factor 1ALUbreast cancercfDIcfDNAcopy number ratioddPCREEF1A2LINE-1liquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID37239866
PMCPMC10217920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.