Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37239793›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Partial Contribution of Socioeconomic Factors to the Mortality Rate of the Working-Age Population in Russia.

Mihajlo Jakovljevic, Olga Kozlova, Maria Makarova, Natalia Neklyudova, Olga Pyshmintseva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mihajlo JakovljevicInstitute of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9160-6846
Olga KozlovaInstitute of Economics, Urals Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 620014 Ekaterinburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0448-3519
Maria MakarovaInstitute of Economics, Urals Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 620014 Ekaterinburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6144-6178
Natalia NeklyudovaInstitute of Economics, Urals Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 620014 Ekaterinburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5026-1394
Olga PyshmintsevaInstitute of Economics, Urals Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 620014 Ekaterinburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5710-9459
Russian Academy of Sciences · RUUniversity of Kragujevac · RS

Funding

Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences No. 0327-2021-0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study's relevance lies in the need to assess the role of socioeconomic, medical, and demographic factors on working-age population mortality in Russia. The purpose of this study is to substantiate the methodological tools for the assessment of the partial contribution of the most important factors that determine the dynamics of the mortality of the working-age population. Our hypothesis is that the factors determining the socioeconomic situation in the country affect the level and dynamics of mortality of the working-age population, but to a different extent in each separate period. To analyse the impact of the factors, we used official Rosstat data for the period from 2005 to 2021. We used the data that reflect the dynamics of socioeconomic and demographic indicators, including the dynamics of mortality of the working-age population in Russia as a whole and in its 85 regions. First, we selected 52 indicators of socioeconomic development and then grouped them into four factor blocks (working conditions, health care, life security, living standards). To reduce the level of statistical noise, we carried out a correlation analysis, which allowed us to narrow down the list to 15 key indicators with the strongest association with the mortality rate of the working-age population. The total period of 2005-2021 was divided into five segments of 3-4 years each, characterising the picture of the socioeconomic state of the country during the period under consideration. The socioeconomic approach used in the study made it possible to assess the extent to which the mortality rate was influenced by the indicators adopted for analysis. The results of this study show that over the whole period, life security (48%) and working conditions (29%) contributed most to the level and dynamics of mortality in the working-age population, while factors determining living standards and the state of the healthcare system accounted for much smaller shares (14% and 9%, respectively). The methodological apparatus of this study is based on the application of methods of machine learning and intelligent data analysis, which allowed us to identify the main factors and their share in the total influence on the mortality rate of the working-age population. The results of this study show the need to monitor the impact of socioeconomic factors on the dynamics and mortality rate of the working-age population in order to improve the effectiveness of social programme. When developing and adjusting government programmes to reduce mortality in the working-age population, the degree of influence of these factors should be taken into account.

Indexed as

healthhealth sectormortalitypartial contributionsocioeconomic factorsworking-age population

Identifiers

PMID37239793
PMCPMC10217853
OpenAlexW4378078306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.