Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37239779›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Automated Uterine Fibroids Detection in Ultrasound Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Ahsan Shahzad, Abid Mushtaq, Abdul Quddoos Sabeeh, Yazeed Yasin Ghadi, Zohaib Mushtaq, Saad Arif, Muhammad Zia Ur Rehman, Muhammad Farrukh Qureshi, Faisal Jamil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of artificial intelligence to ultrasound imaging for benign gynecological disorders: systematic review.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ahsan ShahzadRural Health Centre, Farooka, Sahiwal, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.
Abid MushtaqRural Health Centre, Farooka, Sahiwal, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.
Abdul Quddoos SabeehRural Health Centre, Farooka, Sahiwal, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.
Yazeed Yasin GhadiDepartment of Computer Science, Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 112612, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-7121-495X
Zohaib MushtaqDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-5587-7614
Saad ArifDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, HITEC University, Taxila 47080, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-8905-7294
Muhammad Zia Ur RehmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Riphah International University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-6141-3648
Muhammad Farrukh QureshiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Riphah International University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1167-349X
Faisal JamilDepartment of ICT and Natural Sciences, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 6009 Alesund, Norway.
Riphah International University · PKAl Ain University · AEHITEC University · PKNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversity of Sargodha · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fibroids of the uterus are a common benign tumor affecting women of childbearing age. Uterine fibroids (UF) can be effectively treated with earlier identification and diagnosis. Its automated diagnosis from medical images is an area where deep learning (DL)-based algorithms have demonstrated promising results. In this research, we evaluated state-of-the-art DL architectures VGG16, ResNet50, InceptionV3, and our proposed innovative dual-path deep convolutional neural network (DPCNN) architecture for UF detection tasks. Using preprocessing methods including scaling, normalization, and data augmentation, an ultrasound image dataset from Kaggle is prepared for use. After the images are used to train and validate the DL models, the model performance is evaluated using different measures. When compared to existing DL models, our suggested DPCNN architecture achieved the highest accuracy of 99.8 percent. Findings show that pre-trained deep-learning model performance for UF diagnosis from medical images may significantly improve with the application of fine-tuning strategies. In particular, the InceptionV3 model achieved 90% accuracy, with the ResNet50 model achieving 89% accuracy. It should be noted that the VGG16 model was found to have a lower accuracy level of 85%. Our findings show that DL-based methods can be effectively utilized to facilitate automated UF detection from medical images. Further research in this area holds great potential and could lead to the creation of cutting-edge computer-aided diagnosis systems. To further advance the state-of-the-art in medical imaging analysis, the DL community is invited to investigate these lines of research. Although our proposed innovative DPCNN architecture performed best, fine-tuned versions of pre-trained models like InceptionV3 and ResNet50 also delivered strong results. This work lays the foundation for future studies and has the potential to enhance the precision and suitability with which UF is detected.

Indexed as

computer-aided diagnosisdeep convolutional neural networksInceptionmedical imagingResNetsmart healthcaretumor detectionVGG

Identifiers

PMID37239779
PMCPMC10218188
OpenAlexW4377294128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.