Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37239574›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Objective Assessment of Binaural Benefit from Acoustical Treatment in Real Primary School Classrooms.

Greta Minelli, Giuseppina Emma Puglisi, Arianna Astolfi, Christopher Hauth, Anna Warzybok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Greta MinelliDepartment of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy.
Giuseppina Emma PuglisiDepartment of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8935-693X
Arianna AstolfiDepartment of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2010-6884
Christopher HauthMedizinische Physik and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4All, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany.
Anna WarzybokMedizinische Physik and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4All, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing students with an adequate acoustic environment is crucial for ensuring speech intelligibility in primary school classrooms. Two main approaches to control acoustics in educational facilities consist of reducing background noise and late reverberation. Prediction models for speech intelligibility have been developed and implemented to evaluate the effects of these approaches. In this study, two versions of the Binaural Speech Intelligibility Model (BSIM) were used to predict speech intelligibility in realistic spatial configurations of speakers and listeners, considering binaural aspects. Both versions shared the same binaural processing and speech intelligibility backend processes but differed in the pre-processing of the speech signal. An Italian primary school classroom was characterized in terms of acoustics before (reverberation, T20 = 1.6 ± 0.1 s) and after (T20 = 0.6 ± 0.1 s) an acoustical treatment to compare BSIM predictions to well-established room acoustic measures. With shorter reverberation time, speech clarity and definition improved, as well as speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) (by up to ~6 dB), particularly when the noise source was close to the receiver and an energetic masker was present. Conversely, longer reverberation times resulted (i) in poorer SRTs (by ~11 dB on average) and (ii) in an almost non-existent spatial release from masking at an angle (SRM).

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionAcousticsHumansNoisePerceptual MaskingSchoolsbinaural listeningclassroom acousticsnoisereverberation timespeech intelligibility

Identifiers

PMID37239574
PMCPMC10217896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.