Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37239523›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring with a Wireless Device on a General Ward: A Survey to Explore Nurses' Experiences in a Post-Implementation Period.

Femke L Becking-Verhaar, Robin P H Verweij, Marjan de Vries, Hester Vermeulen, Harry van Goor, Getty J Huisman-de Waal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Femke L Becking-VerhaarDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Huispost 751, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3297-4032
Robin P H VerweijDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Huispost 751, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marjan de VriesDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Huispost 751, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8103-2623
Hester VermeulenScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Huispost 160, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Harry van GoorDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Huispost 751, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0323-4876
Getty J Huisman-de WaalDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Huispost 751, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2811-4176
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurse engagement, perceived need and usefulness affect healthcare technology use, acceptance and improvements in quality, safety and accessibility of healthcare. Nurses' opinions regarding continuous monitoring appear to be positive. However, facilitators and barriers were little studied. This study explored nurses' post-implementation experiences of the facilitators and barriers to continuously monitoring patients' vital signs using a wireless device on general hospital wards.

methodsThis study employed a cross-sectional survey. Vocational and registered nurses from three general wards in a Dutch tertiary university hospital participated in a survey comprising open and closed questions. The data were analysed using thematic analysis and descriptive statistics.

resultsFifty-eight nurses (51.3%) completed the survey. Barriers and facilitators were identified under four key themes: (1) timely signalling and early action, (2) time savings and time consumption, (3) patient comfort and satisfaction and (4) preconditions.

conclusionsAccording to nurses, early detection and intervention for deteriorating patients facilitate the use and acceptance of continuously monitoring vital signs. Barriers primarily concern difficulties connecting patients correctly to the devices and system.

Indexed as

NursesPatients' RoomsCross-Sectional StudiesHospitals, UniversityHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicVital Signscontinuous monitoringearly warning systemfundamental careimplementationnursingremote monitoringthematic analysisvital signswearable deviceswireless monitoring

Identifiers

PMID37239523
PMCPMC10218586
OpenAlexW4378515285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.