Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37239485›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

"Ultimately, You Realize You're on Your Own": The Impact of Prostate Cancer on Gay and Bisexual Men Couples.

Joseph Daniels, Rob Stephenson, Shelby Langer, Laurel Northouse, Roxana Odouli, Channa Amarasekera, Stephen Vandeneeden, Marvin Langston

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Exploring the role of psychological flexibility in relationship functioning among couples coping with prostate cancer: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph DanielsEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
Rob StephensonUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9239-2640
Shelby LangerEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
Laurel NorthouseUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Roxana OdouliDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
Channa AmarasekeraDepartment of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Stephen VandeneedenDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
Marvin LangstonDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Arizona State University · USKaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Michigan · USNorthwestern University · USStanford University · US

Funding

UCSF-Kaiser Urological Epidemiology Research Career Development ProgramK12DK111028 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HUANG, ALISON · 2016 to 2025
$5.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK111028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An estimated one in three gay and bisexual (GB) male couples receive a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis over their life course with limited understanding of the impacts on their relationships. Psychological distress related to PCa diagnosis and treatment-related side effects have been shown to disrupt established GB partnership dynamics. Communication barriers often develop within GB relationships affected by PCa, further exacerbating couple tensions, isolating partners, and lowering quality of life for both patients and partners. In order to elaborate on these phenomena following a PCa diagnosis, we conducted focus group discussions with GB men in relationships. Men were recruited nationally through PCa support groups, and after completing consent procedures, they were invited to one of two focus group discussions conducted through video conference. Topics discussed included the diagnosis and medical decision making pertaining to PCa; healthcare provider experiences; the emotional, physical, and sexual impact of PCa diagnosis and treatment; sources of support and appraisal of resources; and partner involvement and communication. There were twelve GB men who participated in focus group discussions that were audio-recorded and transcribed, and analyzed using a thematic approach. GB couple experiences with PCa during and after treatment choice and recovery identified common patient-provider communication barriers. In particular, GB men reported difficulties in disclosing their sexuality and relationship to their providers, limiting conversations about treatment choice and partner engagement in care. Both patients and partners experienced times of being alone after treatment, either by choice or to give space to their partner. However, partners often did not explicitly discuss their preferences for being alone or together, which resulted in partners' disengagement in their relationship and the prostate cancer healthcare process. This disengagement could blunt the notable PCa survival benefits of partnership for GB men.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsSexual and Gender MinoritiesHumansMaleQuality of LifeSexual BehaviorSexual Partnersbisexual mencommunicationcouplesgay menprostate cancerrelationship

Identifiers

PMID37239485
PMCPMC10218571
OpenAlexW4378516179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.