ArticleGenes2023
US Population Data for 94 Identity-Informative SNP Loci.
Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic analysis of population studies performed with the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep kit.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Characterization of the 172 SNPs Included in the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit in a Population from Northeast Italy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Past, Present and Future Perspectives of Forensic Genetics.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- L-shaped association between ankle-brachial index and coronary heart disease in Chinese adults with hypertension.European journal of medical research · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) analyzed a set of 1036 samples representing four major US population groups (African American, Asian American, Caucasian, and Hispanic) with 94 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) used for individual identification (iiSNPs). The compact size of iiSNP amplicons compared to short tandem repeat (STR) markers increases the likelihood of successful amplification with degraded DNA samples. Allele frequencies and relevant forensic statistics were calculated for each population group as well as the aggregate population sample. Examination of sequence data in the regions flanking the targeted SNPs identified additional variants, which can be combined with the target SNPs to form microhaplotypes (multiple phased SNPs within a short-read sequence). Comparison of iiSNP performance with and without flanking SNP variation identified four amplicons containing microhaplotypes with observed heterozygosity increases of greater than 15% over the targeted SNP alone. For this set of 1036 samples, comparison of average match probabilities from iiSNPs with the 20 CODIS core STR markers yielded an estimate of 1.7 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.