Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37239352›Full record

ReviewGenes2023

Being a Dog: A Review of the Domestication Process.

Domenico Tancredi, Irene Cardinali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Zoological research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A legacy of genetic entanglement with wolves shapes modern dogs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Brain-Behavior Differences in Premodern and Modern Lineages of Domestic Dogs.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Familiar Dog or Familiar Person: Who Do Pet Dogs Best Synchronize with?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Domenico TancrediDepartment of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, Università degli Studi di Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy.
Irene CardinaliDepartment of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, Università degli Studi di Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0632-9993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of canine domestication represents certainly one of the most interesting questions that evolutionary biology aims to address. A "multiphase" view of this process is now accepted, with a first phase during which different groups of wolves were attracted by the anthropogenic niche and a second phase characterized by the gradual establishment of mutual relationships between wolves and humans. Here, we provide a review of dog (

Indexed as

WolvesAnimalsBiological EvolutionDNA, MitochondrialDogsDomesticationHumansPhylogenyDNA, MitochondrialCanis familiarisdogdomesticationMediterranean areamitochondrial DNAwolvesY chromosome

Identifiers

PMID37239352
PMCPMC10218297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.