Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37239342›Full record

ArticleGenes2023

Clinical Experience with Genome-Wide Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in a Large Cohort of Twin Pregnancies.

Luigia De Falco, Giovanni Savarese, Pasquale Savarese, Nadia Petrillo, Monica Ianniello, Raffaella Ruggiero, Teresa Suero, Cosimo Barbato, Alessio Mori, Cristina Ramiro and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luigia De FalcoAMES, Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale, 80013 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0553-2087
Giovanni SavareseAMES, Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale, 80013 Naples, Italy.
Pasquale SavareseAMES, Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale, 80013 Naples, Italy.
Nadia PetrilloAMES, Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale, 80013 Naples, Italy.
Monica IannielloAMES, Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale, 80013 Naples, Italy.
Raffaella RuggieroAMES, Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale, 80013 Naples, Italy.
Teresa SueroAMES, Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale, 80013 Naples, Italy.
Cosimo BarbatoAMES, Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale, 80013 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-9079-1455
Alessio MoriAMES, Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale, 80013 Naples, Italy.
Cristina RamiroAMES, Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale, 80013 Naples, Italy.
Luigi Della CorteDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80013 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0584-2181
Gabriele SacconeDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80013 Naples, Italy.
Attilio Di Spiezio SardoDepartment of Public Health, Gynecology Unit-Federico II University Hospital of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6485-5735
Antonio FicoAMES, Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale, 80013 Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITFederico II University Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in twin gestations has been shown to have high detection rates and low false-positive rates for trisomy 21, as seen in singleton pregnancies, although there have been few large cohort twin studies, genome-wide studies in particular, to date. In this study, we looked at the performance of genome-wide NIPT in a large cohort consisting of 1244 twin pregnancy samples collected over a two-year period in a single laboratory in Italy. All samples underwent an NIPS for common trisomies, with 61.5% of study participants choosing to undergo genome-wide NIPS for additional fetal anomalies (namely, rare autosomal aneuploidies and CNVs). There were nine initial no-call results, all of which were resolved upon retest. Based on our NIPS results, 17 samples were at high risk for trisomy 21, one for trisomy 18, six for a rare autosomal aneuploidy, and four for a CNV. Clinical follow-up was available for 27 out of 29 high-risk cases; a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 99.9%, and a PPV of 94.4% were noted for trisomy 21. Clinical follow-up was also available for 1110 (96.6%) of the low-risk cases, all of which were true negatives. In conclusion, we found that NIPS was a reliable screening approach for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies.

Indexed as

Chromosome DisordersDown SyndromeNoninvasive Prenatal TestingFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy, TwinPrenatal DiagnosisTrisomyfailure rategenome-wide sequencingnon-invasive prenatal testingsensitivityspecificitytwin pregnancies

Identifiers

PMID37239342
PMCPMC10218036
OpenAlexW4367321690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.