Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37239173›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

Rituximab Biosimilar BCD020 Shows Superior Efficacy above Conventional Non-Biologics Treatment in Pediatric Lupus Nephritis: The Data of Retrospective Cohort Study.

Mikhail Kostik, Elvira Kalashnikova, Raupov Rinat, Eugenia Isupova, Ekaterina Gaidar, Anton A Soloviev, Vera Masalova, Ludmila Snegireva, Tatyana Kornishina, Natalia Abramova and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mikhail KostikHospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1180-8086
Elvira KalashnikovaHospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Raupov RinatHospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7749-6663
Eugenia IsupovaHospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Ekaterina GaidarHospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Anton A SolovievHospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Vera MasalovaHospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Ludmila SnegirevaHospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Tatyana KornishinaHospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Natalia AbramovaHospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Evgeny SuspitsinHospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Lubov SorokinaHospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Maria KanevaHospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Margarita F DubkoHospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Natalia LubimovaAlmazov National Medical Research Centre, 197341 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Ekaterina KuchuinskayaAlmazov National Medical Research Centre, 197341 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Olga KalashnikovaHospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Vyacheslav ChasnykHospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5776-1490
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University · RUFederal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre · RUInstitute of Oncology NN Petrov · RU

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation Agreement No. 075-15-2022-301Russian Science Foundation № 22-45-08004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most serious manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in children, determining the outcomes of the disease. There are no standardized treatment protocols for pediatric LN, and the role of biologics has not yet been conclusively defined.

objectivesanalyze the safety and efficacy of rituximab biosimilar BCD020 in pediatric patients with lupus nephritis.

methodsin a retrospective cohort study, the data from the case histories of 25 patients with LN (10 boys and 15 girls) with an onset age of 13 (9-16) years, who failed conventional non-biologic treatment or developed corticosteroid dependence/toxicity, were included. The diagnosis was made using Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria. Rituximab biosimilar BCD020 was prescribed in a dosage of 375 mg/m

resultsThe main patient's characteristics were: Pre-rituximab non-biologic conventional treatment included: cyclophosphamide 15 (60%), MMF 8 (32%), azathioprine 3 (12%), hydroxychloroquine 12 (48%), and pulse therapy of methylprednisolone followed by oral methylprednisolone 25 (100%). The time before rituximab was 7.0 (3.0-24.0) months, and the whole observation period was 7.0 (0; 24) months. The initial pre-rituximab treatment slightly reduced SLEDAI levels and the proportion of patients with LN. A significant reduction of SLEDAI, the anti-dsDNA level, proteinuria, hematuria, C4 complement, ESR, and the median corticosteroid dose by 80% from the initial value, as well as the proportion of patients without corticosteroids, was observed after rituximab administration. Two deaths were observed due to catastrophic SLE with macrophage activation syndrome, accompanied by a severe infection (invasive aspergillosis,

conclusionsRituximab biosimilar BCD020 showed effectiveness in LN, whereas previous non-biologic treatment was insufficiently effective. Randomized controlled trials are required to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab and evaluate the benefits when compared with conventional SLE treatment.

Indexed as

B-cellschildrenlupus nephritisrituximabsystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID37239173
PMCPMC10216075
OpenAlexW4378085791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.