Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37239105›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2023

FDA Approvals of Biologics in 2022.

Alexander C Martins, Fernando Albericio, Beatriz G de la Torre

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A new STAT3-based potency assay for human G-CSF analog therapeutics.Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexander C MartinsSchool of Health Sciences, UAM, Universidade Anhembi-Morumbi, São Paulo 03101-001, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7637-5410
Fernando AlbericioSchool of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8946-0462
Beatriz G de la TorreKRISP, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8521-9172
Anhembi Morumbi University · BRBiomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine · ESUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

National Research Foundation Blue Skies
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The year 2022 witnessed the control of the COVID-19 pandemic in most countries through social and hygiene measures and also vaccination campaigns. It also saw a decrease in total approvals by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Nevertheless, there was no fall in the Biologics class, which was boosted through the authorization of 15 novel molecules, thus maintaining the figures achieved in previous years. Indeed, the decrease in approvals was only for the category of small molecules. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) continued to be the drug class with the most approvals, and cancer remained the most targeted disease, followed by autoimmune conditions, as in previous years. Interestingly, the FDA gave the green light to a remarkable number of bispecific Biologics (four), the highest number in recent years. Indeed, 2022 was another year without the approval of an antimicrobial Biologic, although important advancements were made in targeting new diseases, which are discussed herein. In this work, we only analyze the Biologics authorized in 2022. Furthermore, we also consider the orphan drugs authorized. We not only apply a quantitative analysis to this year's harvest, but also compare the efficacy of the Biologics with those authorized in previous years. On the basis of their chemical structure, the Biologics addressed fall into the following classes: monoclonal antibodies; antibody-drug conjugates; and proteins/enzymes.

Indexed as

anacaulaseantibody-drug conjugateBiologicseflapegrastimenzymesFDAfirst approvalmonoclonal antibodiesorphan drug

Identifiers

PMID37239105
PMCPMC10216111
OpenAlexW4376273815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.