Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37238915›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

A Pig Model to Assess Skin Lesions after Apomorphine Application.

Vera Martin, Christian Knecht, Sophie Duerlinger, Barbara Richter, Andrea Ladinig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vera MartinUniversity Clinic for Swine, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Christian KnechtUniversity Clinic for Swine, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Sophie DuerlingerUniversity Clinic for Swine, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Barbara RichterInstitute of Pathology and Forensic Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Andrea LadinigUniversity Clinic for Swine, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Research Promotion Agency 889815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to their similarities, pigs are often used as experimental models for humans. In particular, the similarity of the skin allows them to be a good dermatological model. The aim of the study was to develop an animal model in conventional domestic pigs to evaluate skin lesions macroscopically and histologically after a continuous subcutaneous apomorphine application. A total of 16 pigs from two different age groups were injected with four different apomorphine formulations for 12 h daily over a period of 28 days into the subcutis, which was then evaluated macroscopically for nodules and erythema, as well as histologically. Differences in skin lesions between the formulations were found, with formulation 1 leading to the fewest nodules, least skin lesions, no lymph follicles, least necrosis, and best skin tolerance. Older pigs were easier to handle and, because of the thicker skin and subcutis of these animals, drug application with the appropriate needle length was safer. The experimental setup worked well and an animal model to assess skin lesions after a continuous subcutaneous application of drugs could be successfully established.

Indexed as

apomorphine applicationdermatological modelpig modelskin lesions

Identifiers

PMID37238915
PMCPMC10215269
OpenAlexW4366827218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.