ReviewBiomedicines2023
Increasing Specificity of Targeted DNA Methylation Editing by Non-Enzymatic CRISPR/dCas9-Based Steric Hindrance.
Review in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR-Cas9 and next-generation gene editing strategies for therapeutic intervention of neurodegenerative pathways in Alzheimer's disease: a state-of-the-art review.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Review
- Non-clinical safety considerations on genome editing using the CRISPR/Cas system.Genes & diseases · 2026Review
- Multifunctional nanoplatforms for optic nerve regeneration integrating anti-inflammatory, epigenetic, and ionic mechanisms with emerging artificial intelligence technologies.Cell biology and toxicology · 2025Review
- Vector-free intra-airway in vivo epigenetic editing.Trends in biotechnology · 2025Article
- UniClo: scarless hierarchical DNA assembly without sequence constraint.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Amplification-free, OR-gated CRISPR-Cascade reaction for pathogen detection in blood samples.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Integration of CRISPR/dCas9-Based methylation editing with guide positioning sequencing identifies dynamic changes of mrDEGs in breast cancer progression.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Article
- Linking Aging to Cancer: The Role of Chromatin Biology.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024Review
- The role of epigenetic mechanisms in the long-term effects of early-life adversity and mother-infant relationship on physiology and behavior of offspring in laboratory rats and mice.Developmental psychobiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As advances in genome engineering inch the technology towards wider clinical use-slowed by technical and ethical hurdles-a newer offshoot, termed "epigenome engineering", offers the ability to correct disease-causing changes in the DNA without changing its sequence and, thus, without some of the unfavorable correlates of doing so. In this review, we note some of the shortcomings of epigenetic editing technology-specifically the risks involved in the introduction of epigenetic enzymes-and highlight an alternative epigenetic editing strategy using physical occlusion to modify epigenetic marks at target sites without a requirement for any epigenetic enzyme. This may prove to be a safer alternative for more specific epigenetic editing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.