ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Feasibility Study of Combining Hyperspectral Imaging with Deep Learning for Chestnut-Quality Detection.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pixel-level bruise area quantification in strawberries using dual-band hyperspectral imaging and Efficient1DNet: Toward real-time quality monitoring.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Exploring the broad spectrum of machine learning technologies in the food sector: A comprehensive review of techniques and practical applications.Current research in food science · 2026Review
- Automation and Optimization of Food Process Using CNN and Six-Axis Robotic Arm.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid detection of chestnut quality is a critical aspect of chestnut processing. However, traditional imaging methods pose a challenge for chestnut-quality detection due to the absence of visible epidermis symptoms. This study aims to develop a quick and efficient detection method using hyperspectral imaging (HSI, 935-1720 nm) and deep learning modeling for qualitative and quantitative identification of chestnut quality. Firstly, we used principal component analysis (PCA) to visualize the qualitative analysis of chestnut quality, followed by the application of three pre-processing methods to the spectra. To compare the accuracy of different models for chestnut-quality detection, traditional machine learning models and deep learning models were constructed. Results showed that deep learning models were more accurate, with FD-LSTM achieving the highest accuracy of 99.72%. Moreover, the study identified important wavelengths for chestnut-quality detection at around 1000, 1400 and 1600 nm, to improve the efficiency of the model. The FD-UVE-CNN model achieved the highest accuracy of 97.33% after incorporating the important wavelength identification process. By using the important wavelengths as input for the deep learning network model, recognition time decreased on average by 39 s. After a comprehensive analysis, FD-UVE-CNN was deter-mined to be the most effective model for chestnut-quality detection. This study suggests that deep learning combined with HSI has potential for chestnut-quality detection, and the results are encouraging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.