Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Tao LuoCollege of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7838-1267
Xiaolan LinCollege of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Tingting LaiCollege of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Libing LongCollege of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Ziying LaiCollege of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Xinxin DuCollege of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Xiaomeng GuoCollege of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Liang ShuaiCollege of Chemistry and Food Science, Nanchang Normal University, Nanchang 330032, China.
Dongmei HanInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Zhenxian WuCollege of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
South China Agricultural University · CNGuangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNNanchang Normal University · CN
Funding
Earmarked Fund for China Agricultural Research System-Litchi and Longan CARS-32Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2022A1515012049Guangxi Natural Science Foundation 2022GXNSFBA035001Key Areas of Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province 2018B020202011National Natural Science Foundation of China 32260611
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Gibberellic acids had been proven to improve the fruit quality and storability by delaying deterioration and maintaining the antioxidant system. In this study, the effect of GA
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.