Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37238681›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2023

Influence of Gelatin Source and Bloom Number on Gelatin Methacryloyl Hydrogels Mechanical and Biological Properties for Muscle Regeneration.

Mohammad B Aljaber, Fiona Verisqa, Zalike Keskin-Erdogan, Kapil D Patel, David Y S Chau, Jonathan C Knowles

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. GelMA synthesis and sources comparison for 3D multimaterial bioprinting.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Journal of tissue engineering
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohammad B AljaberDivision of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, Royal Free Hospital Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Fiona VerisqaDivision of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, Royal Free Hospital Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Zalike Keskin-ErdoganDivision of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, Royal Free Hospital Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6789-6954
Kapil D PatelUCL Eastman-Korea Dental Medicine Innovation Centre, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0393-9166
David Y S ChauDivision of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, Royal Free Hospital Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9200-6749
Jonathan C KnowlesDivision of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, Royal Free Hospital Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3917-3446
The Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately half of an adult human's body weight is made up of muscles. Thus, restoring the functionality and aesthetics of lost muscle tissue is critical. The body is usually able to repair minor muscle injuries. However, when volumetric muscle loss occurs due to tumour extraction, for instance, the body will form fibrous tissue instead. Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels have been applied for drug delivery, tissue adhesive, and various tissue engineering applications due to their tuneable mechanical properties. Here, we have synthesised GelMA from different gelatin sources (i.e., porcine, bovine, and fish) with varying bloom numbers, which refers to the gel strength, and investigated for the influence of the source of gelatin and the bloom number on biological activities and mechanical properties. The results indicated that the source of the gelatin and variable bloom numbers have an impact on GelMA hydrogel properties. Furthermore, our findings established that the bovine-derived gelatin methacryloyl (B-GelMA) has better mechanical properties than the other varieties composed of porcine and fish with 60 kPa, 40 kPa, and 10 kPa in bovine, porcine, and fish, respectively. Additionally, it showed a noticeably greater swelling ratio (SR) ~1100% and a reduced rate of degradation, improving the stability of hydrogels and giving cells adequate time to divide and proliferate to compensate for muscle loss. Furthermore, the bloom number of gelatin was also proven to influence the mechanical properties of GelMA. Interestingly, although GelMA made of fish had the lowest mechanical strength and gel stability, it demonstrated excellent biological properties. Overall, the results emphasise the importance of gelatin source and bloom number, allowing GelMA hydrogels to have a wide range of mechanical and excellent biological properties and making them suitable for various muscle tissue regeneration applications.

Indexed as

GelatinHydrogelsAnimalsCattleFishesHumansMethacrylatesMusclesSwineTissue EngineeringGelatingelatin methacryloylHydrogelsMethacrylatesGelMAhydrogelmechanical propertiesmuscle regenerationtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID37238681
PMCPMC10216482
OpenAlexW4378515582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.